Answer each question with a 150 word count minimum in full detail/ 1.Discuss with your peers, the…

Answer each question with a 150 word count minimum in full detail/

1.Discuss with your peers, the importance of effective budgeting, and why it is critical for a company’s success.

2. What are the benefits of effective budgeting?

3. Why must a company keep on par with its budget, what are some numerous ways this could help a company bottom line?

1.Discuss with your peers the factors that you would consider when deciding whether to investigate a variance?

2. What are some common things within the workplace that would lead you to consider an investigation of a variance?

3. Why would controllability be consider a variance to investigate?

1.Describe how you will apply that learning in your daily life, including your work life. (Effective Budgeting)

2.Describe what may be unclear to you, and what you would like to learn

I need a research thesis topic. I want to research the Teen Court Informal Adjustment Program and… 1 answer below »

I need a research thesis topic. I want to research the Teen Court Informal Adjustment Program and measure the effectiveness and recidivism of juveniles in the program since 2006. How do I word this? Is it a good Thesis Research Topic for a Graduate Level Thesis?

The main environmental causes of cancer are the products of our highly industrialized way of life…

The main environmental causes of cancer are the products of our highly industrialized way of life such as pollution and food additives.

Having read this week’s assigned materials, and having a clear understanding of what is meant by…

Discussion (200 words)
Job postings often state that the successful applicant must have "superior critical thinking and
problem solving skills." Employers tell college administrators that graduates, both from
undergraduate and graduate programs, often lack these skills.
1.Having read this week's assigned materials, and having a clear understanding of what is meant by
"critical thinking," why are employers making these comments?
2.Are they justified?
Written Assignment (800 words)
Tell of a conflict that you recently encountered. It could be a conflict at work, in the news, or one
involving a personal relationship. After explaining the conflict, choose one of the four presented
critical analysis tools from this week, and analyze the situation using the tool.
This assignment should be very detailed and specific in terms of how you analyzed the different
aspects of the conflict. It should be at least 800 words in length.

Analysis and Commentary ………………………………………………… 1 answer below »

Analysis and Commentary

Due Date

Monday 25 October 9am

Description Assignment Task 2 requires linguistic analysis of the provided texts, as well as interpretation of/commentary on the analysis. The focus of the assignment is to be able to undertake accurate analysis and to relate formand meaning, that is, to reason about what meanings are made and how and why they are made. You will also be required to draw some pedagogical implications from this analysis.

Your analysis and commentary needs to include a genre analysis, that is an analysis of the genre, stages and phases of the text. It is best to present this in tabular format. In addition to the genre analysis you will also need to include some analysis at clause level (e.g. process types, nominal groups, nominalisation), and some from ‘beyond the clause’ (e.g. periodicity, identification, conjunction, appraisal). Your full analyses should be included in the appendix of your assignment and is not part of the word count.

In your commentary you should discuss your analysis in terms of what it can tell you about the texts and their differences (in terms of field, tenor and mode). You should also comment on the pedagogical implications of this: i.e. what knowledge about language do teachers and students need to be able to produce these texts and similar ones? How can students be enabled to improve upon their writing

Weighting

50%

Format / Length / Duration

Expected length of the comment component is 1800 – 2400 words, with full copies of analyses provided (in appendices).

Assessment Criteria ? accuracy of linguistic analysis of provided text

? Ability to relate grammatical form and text structure to meaning

? Ability to draw pedagogical implications from the text

Subject Learning Outcomes Assessed 3. analyse texts, demonstrating a familiarity with functional grammar

4. describe and interpret the significance of various grammatical patternings in a range of texts

5. apply this knowledge about texts in specific teaching and learning contexts

Method of Submission Submission is through the Turnitin link on the subject’s Moodle site.

This assessment task has been set up to be checked by Turnitin, a tool for checking if it has unreferenced content. You can submit your assessment task to Turnitin prior to the due date and Turnitin will give you an originality report. You can then make any changes that may be required and re-submit you final version by the due date.

Current Russia’s agricultures relationship with Russia’s weather factor during the whole year…. 1 answer below »

Current Russia’s agricultures relationship with Russia’s weather factor during the whole year. Need the reference part, nearly 200-300 words.

Please write research proposal about “About the tourism motivation of the America market to visit… 1 answer below »

Please write research proposal about “About the tourism motivation of the America market to visit Zermatt in winter”. Please assign to Sarah
STRUCTURE:
Title page: (no pictures) state the title of your dissertation; your name; the course you are studying; the school you study at; and the date.
Abstract: there should be an abstract, in which you should state the main points from your Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Results and Analysis and Conclusions, in roughly 100 to 200 words.
Acknowledgements: This section is written to provide you with an opportunity to thank anyone that helped you through the process of your dissertation.
Contents Page: here you should list all headings and Sub-headings of your work on the left hand side of the page and opposite the headings, you should state which page they appear on – (on the right hand side of the page). Do not put this information into a table.
Chapter 1: Introduction: Your introduction should outline the purpose of your research and introduce the research topic you have chosen to study. At the end of the introduction, you should state your aim and objectives (see my comments above regarding this).
Chapter 2: Literature Review: In this section, you should provide a review of relevant literature relating to your research topic. Here, you might try to identify a model for evaluating your chosen research topic (in relation to your aim and objectives)
Chapter 3: Methodology: Your methodology should explain the research methods you chose to carry out your research. This section should include the following:
Secondary Research:
– State the sources of information that were available to you;
– State the sources of information you used, eg. books, journal articles, newspapers, etc.
– State where you got the sources from, eg, On-line, or in the SMU library, etc.
– State why you chose to use these sources and not others.
Primary Research:
– State the primary research methods that you could have used;
– State and explain the methods you chose to use and why you chose them over others available;
– explain what/who your research population was and how you selected a sample of respondents from this population (in doing this, you may also wish to consider the validity of your chosen sample in relation to the population of respondents available).
Presentation and Analysis of Findings:
– Explain how your findings (in Chapter 4) were presented, eg, in tables, graphs, diagrams, etc, or in continuous prose, eg, case-study form;
– Explain how you analysed your findings (in chapter 4) eg, cross-tabulation of findings; comparing and contrasting findings; comparing theory with findings; etc.
Limitations:
State what experiences you had that limited your performance in carrying out your research.
Chapter 4: Results and Analysis: Present your findings and analysis in accordance with what you said you would do in your methodology under the section headed Presentation and Analysis of Findings.
Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommendations: State the main conclusions from your research and state whether you managed to achieve your aim and objectives or not. Question whether there is potential to further develop the area of research you have studied, etc.
You should also provide headings for each of these sections to allow the reader to identify where one section begins and another ends. This will also be indicated in your Contents page, as explained above.

Rhetorical Analysis of a Written Textual Source Word count : 1000-2000 words…

Rhetorical Analysis of a Written Textual Source

Word count: 1000-2000 words

Overview: you’ll write a thesis-driven analysis of the strength of an argument made in a text, or source, related to our theme of conspiracies/conspiracy theories. It will be a WRITTEN (not visual) source.You will be evaluating whether the source is credible enough to use as a source for your final research paper (which will explore the ethics of discussing a particular conspiracy theory).

You will pick your own written text to write about. There is not a required length for the written text you pick, but you need to make sure it has enough content for you to be able to fulfill the essay's requirements.

You will include at leastone outside source aside from the main source you are analyzing that will help serve as Evidence to support a point from one of yourbody paragraphs. This source must also bewritten, not visual. Bring readers into the context of the reading. In what larger conversation is the author participating? What ethical problems or questions appear in this text? Why are they important? What’s at stake? Introduce the text to the reader, briefly summarize its main idea, and make a claim (thesis) for the author’s rhetorical strategies. A strong claim is both contestable – reasonable people might disagree – and predictive – it will set up expectations for your reader.

Your mission is to answer the question: what is the information this text is providing, can we trust it, and why? You might evaluate how persuasive the text is in the course of evaluating how credible it is, but your primary objective is to evaluate credibility, not persuasiveness.

? Develop your main points around specific rhetorical strategies. Consider how the author constructs the argument, not whether or not you agree. Analysis relies on objective judgments.(This means you should not use "I" in your paper–as in "I think this text is credible because….")

Remember also that rhetoric encompasses any tools available for persuasion. You might consider how the author’s attempts to be persuasive affect the text’s overall credibility. For example, would it be useful to talk about the argument in terms of ethos, logos, and/or pathos? Or on purpose, audience, and/or genre?

? Support your main points with concrete examples (evidence) from the text. To develop and support your own points, you will need to include specific examples in the form of paraphrase or short direct quotations.

Outline:

Your introduction will present a hook that interests the reader in the topic your text explores, provide some contextualizing information about the text (what is it? Who wrote it? When? Why?) and about the conspiracy/conspiracy theory it's related to, and summarize the purpose/argument of your text. You will conclude the introduction with your own thesis statement about whether your text is credible and the reasons why.

(You can write about reasons the text is both credible and not credible…the thesis just has to make it clear which one it ultimately is."While the text might seem credible because of [reason a], it's ultimately not credible because of [reasons b and c].")

Your second paragraph will provide a summary of the text, presenting the information the text presents in the order it presents it, without getting too general or too detailed.

You will have a minimum of 3 body paragraphs after your summary paragraph, even if you will meet the minimum word count with just the intro, summary, 2 body paragraphs and the conclusion. Your body paragraphs will consist of the MEAL plan. (Note that this is one more body paragraph than Essay 1!)

Your conclusion will summarize the content of your paper (think one line-summaries for each body paragraph), and will present how this text might be used in an argument about the conspiracy/conspiracy theory you'll write about in your research paper.

Your paper will be in MLA format: You will include a new page entitled "Works Cited":

Gives the formal citation for your article in MLA (Works Cited) format. You can find the general guidelines of and models for MLA citations by consulting: the Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL). The Works Cited citations do NOT count as part of the paper's word count. Like the first essay, this text should have at least two sources in its Works Cited—the main written text you’re analyzing and at least one outside source you’re using to support your argument. </pstyle="font-family:></pstyle="font-family:>

Whose culture (which section of the nation) is emphasized in the national culture? How? Provide a…

Whose culture (which section of the nation) is emphasized in the national culture? How? Provide a couple of examples.