lpl-surveillance-policy-final-project

The purpose of the Final Project is to apply what you learn about research and evaluation design methods to the evaluation of a program, problem, or policy in the organization. This is merely an evaluation design. You are not required to collect data and implement the research to evaluate the program.

Your Final Project will be submitted in the form of a 14 pages (not including the title or reference pages), double-spaced, APA-formatted paper. You must complete the following elements:

  • Create and include a title page with your name, the course name, and the title of the research project.
  • Write an Executive Summary that briefly describes the highlights of the evaluation design and the program, problem, or policy it is intended to evaluate.
  • Briefly describe the organization and include a brief history of the organization as well as information about the purpose of the organization.
  • Describe the program, problem, or policy to be evaluated, include information regarding the purpose of the program, problem, or policy, and explain why conducting this research to evaluate the program, problem, or policy is important to this organization.
  • Describe the research question(s) and hypothesis(es). Clearly articulate them so that you would be able to answer the research questions using the design you develop.
  • Explain the evaluation design (i.e., descriptive, associational, causal) that is most appropriate to evaluate the program, problem, or policy. Justify the use of the evaluation design and explain how it can answer the research question(s).
  • Explain the sampling technique, and justify how this technique will help to answer the research question.
  • Explain potential ethical issues for this evaluation design. Analyze the implications of the ethical issues and explain how you would respond to them
  • Explain the findings you would anticipate if you conducted the research and implemented the evaluation design to evaluate the program, problem, or policy. Assure that your explanation is appropriate for your intended audience.
  • Cover page
  • Executive summary (abstract): This should be written after your Final Evaluation Design is complete and consists of a brief (usually one paragraph) summary of the design.
  • Revised Week 3 Assignment
  • Revised Week 7 Assignment
  • Description and justification of the analytical techniques (descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, measures of association, and regression analysis) that you think are most appropriate for your evaluation
  • References page

Your Final Project must demonstrate both breadth and depth of knowledge and critical thinking appropriate to graduate-level scholarship. It must follow APA Publication Manual guidelines and be free of typographical, spelling, and grammatical errors. The project should be 14 pages in length (double-spaced), not including the title page, the Executive Summary, and references.

Be sure to support your Final Project with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You must use a minimum of 10 scholarly resources.

MMPA 6480/5480, NPMG 6480/5480, MSEM 6480/5480, MMPP 6480: Applied Research and Evaluation Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.ahrq.gov/ American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). (2014). Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/racial-justice/racial-profili… American Society for Public Administration (ASPA). (Revised 2013). ASPA code of ethics. Retrieved from http://www.aspanet.org/public/ASPA/Resources/Code_… s/Code%20of%20Ethics1.aspx?hkey=acd40318-a945-4ffc-ba7b-18e037b1a858 Bureau of Labor Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2014, from www.bls.gov Carnochan, S., Samples, M., Myers, M., & Austin, M. J. (2013). Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit human service organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Cave, E., & Holm, S. (2003). Milgram and Tuskegee: Paradigm research projects in bioethics. Health Care Analysis, 11(1), 27–40. Center for Political Communication. (2013). University of Delaware Center for Political Communication: September 2013 national agenda poll. Retrieved from http://www.udel.edu/cpc/research/fall2013/National_Agenda_2013_Topline_Full. pdf © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 2 of 5 Centers for Disease Control. (2013). 2013 CDC health disparities and inequalities report. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/CHDIReport.html Delaware Health & Social Services. (2008). 2008 Delaware racial and ethnic disparities: Health status report card. Retrieved from http://www.dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dph/mh/files/200… Delaware Natural Resources Defense Council. (2011). Testing the waters. Retrieved from http://www.nrdc.org/water/oceans/ttw/sumdel.pdf Edin, K., & Pirog, M. A. (2014). Special symposium on qualitative and mixed-methods for policy analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 33(2), 345–349. Foley, J. (n.d.). A tale of two worlds. Retrieved June 7, 2014, from http://ensia.com/voices/a-tale-of-two-worlds/ Friends National Resource Center. (2009). Using qualitative data in program evaluation. Retrieved from http://friendsnrc.org/using-qualitative-in-program… Gallup. (n.d.). Retrieved June 8, 2014, from http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx?ref=b Gallup. (2013). How does Gallup polling work? Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/101872/how-does-gallup-… Gallup. (2013). Understanding Gallup’s likely voter procedures for presidential elections. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/111268/how-gallups-like… Garson, G. D. (2009, April 4). Logistic regression. Retrieved from http://faculty.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/PA765/logisti… Harding, D. J., Wyse, J. J. B., Dobson, C., & Morenoff, J. D. (2014). Making ends meet after prison. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 33(2), 440–470. © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 3 of 5 Hatry, H. P. (2013). Sorting the relationships among performance measurement, program evaluation, and performance management. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013(137), 19–32. Hill, J. (n.d.). Introduction to descriptive statistics. University of Illinois, Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Retrieved June 7, 2014, from http://mste.illinois.edu/hill/dstat/dstat.html Johnson, G. (2014). Research methods for public administrators (3rd ed.). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe. Jones, J. M. (2014, January). Record-high 42% of Americans identify as independents. Gallup Politics. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/166763/record-highameri… Laureate Education (Producer). (2013a). Central tendency and variability [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Laureate Education (Producer). (2014). Correlation and introduction to regression. [Multimedia file] Baltimore, MD: Author. Laureate Education. . (2013b). New Harbor, Delaware and sampling design. . Baltimore, MD: Author. Laureate Education (Producer). (2013c). Virtual community. [Multimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Lee Abbott, M., & McKinney, J. (2012). Learning from populations: Censuses and samples. In Understanding and applying research design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 4 of 5 Litman, T. (2008). Evaluating research quality: Guidelines for scholarship. Victoria, British Columbia: Victoria Transport Quality Institute. McCauley, C. (2012). Testing theories of radicalization in polls of U.S. Muslims. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12(1), 296–311. Public Policy Polling. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/ Public Policy Research. (2002). Comparing recyclers and nonrecyclers in N/NE Portland: Implications for increasing participation in the curbside program. Retrieved from http://www.publicpolicyresearch.net/documents/recy… Randles, J. M. (2014). Partnering and parenting in poverty: A qualitative analysis of a relationship skills program for low-income, unmarried families. Journal of Policy Analysis Management, 33(2), 385–412. Rasmussen Reports. (2014). Daily presidential tracking poll. Retrieved from http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/pol… daily_presidential_tracking_poll Silver, N. (2012). Which polls fared best (and worst) in the 2012 presidential election? New York Times, November 12, 2012. Retrieved from http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/1… State of Delaware Division of Watershed Stewardship. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.dnrec.delaware.gov/swc/wa/Pages/Polluti… utaryActionTeams.aspx StatPac. (2009). Qualities of a good question. Retrieved from http://www.statpac.com/surveys/question-qualities…. © 2014 Laureate Education, Inc. Page 5 of 5 Surveyspro. (2009). Reporting survey results. Retrieved from http://www.esurveyspro.com/article-reporting-surve… Taber, D. R., Chriqui, J. F., Powell, L., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2013). Association between state laws governing school meal nutrition content and student weight status: Implications for new USDA school meal standards. JAMA Pediatrics, 167(6), 513–519. Trochim, W. M. K. (2006, October 20). Inferential statistics. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statinf.ph… United Nations. (n.d.). Official documents and bibliographic databases. Retrieved June 7, 2014, from http://www.un.org/en/databases/ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2014). Retrieved from http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations Vaterlaus, J., & Higginbotham, B. (2011). Qualitative program evaluation methods. NCSU: Raleigh, NC. Retrieved from http://ncsu.edu/ffci/publications/2011/v16- n1-2011-spring/vaterlaus-higginbotham.php Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2004). Outcome of Washington state’s research-based programs for juvenile offenders. Retrieved from www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/852

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
FIRST15

Order Now